Category: Uncategorized

(Post on June 19, 2025, before US air and naval cruise missile strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities)

Donald Trump has the ball on the 10-yard line, just 10 yards away from the winning touchdown. However, the braggart quarterback, the Deshaun Watson of political football, is mistake prone. Will he fumble the ball, be befuddled by the cacophony of bad advice in the huddle, or throw an interception? The allegory describes the situation facing Trump in the broader Ukraine-Iran-Taiwan conflict. At stake is success in the looming face-off with the dangerous ChiComs.

Will he blow it? Probably, if he listens to Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson, VP Vance, and the rest of the MAGA-adjacent crowd who are paralyzed in fear by their version of the old Vietnam Syndrome, the Iraq Syndrome. Every conflict is imagined to be Iraq all over again. Trump is already preternaturally inclined to a kind of right-wing pacificism due to his loud commitment to no more “forever wars”.

But not all wars are “forever wars”. Many are one-and-done, quick strikes, no boots on the ground, what one 19th-century British wag referred to, in their Frontier Wars, as “butcher-and-bolt” affairs. And that leaves aside the mangling of the history of the Vietnam and Iraq Wars, which is necessary to make the story fit the debilitating prescription of conflict avoidance at all costs.

Right now, Trump has the golden opportunity to clear the field for a genuine pivot to Asia. Putin is bogged down in Ukraine. The mullahs are on the cusp of collapse. They could go with their nuclear program. All that is needed is cementing a broad coalition to feed more aid to Ukraine, drop a few GBU-57 MOPs on Fordow, and construct a parameter of allies around China. America doesn’t have to do it all. It can be done on the cheap if Trump doesn’t blow it in pacifism and trade wars.

Today, there appears to be sweaty palms and hand-wringing in the administration over airstrikes to finish off the ayatollahs’ nuclear ambitions. Whether the regime survives or not is beside the point. So, this won’t be “regime change”, which by the way would be a pleasant thought, nonetheless. Pleasant but not necessary. Leave it to the millions of the disaffected in the country to deal with. Chaos or no, gone will be a nuclear-armed “Death to America”.

Elbridge Colby, the number two at Defense, is known for his insistence on a pivot to Asia. Well, stop the tariff campaign against friends, the threats to allies like Denmark over Greenland, the sideshow of militarily menacing Panama, and the belittling of allies that you’ll need to corral China like Australia and the rest of the AUKUS coalition. And stop the Putin pandering (It’s absolutely shameful.) and funnel more coalition support to Ukraine. Clear the decks to be better able to confront Communist China and leave no brush fires burning behind the lines. Burdens are shared giving us time and resources to build up.

Trump, drop the MOPs and get out. Is that so difficult?

RogerG

Trump brings in Chick-Fil-A manager to negotiate peace between Russia, Ukraine.  The latest from the Babylon Bee news service. I thought you might want to know. I guess that his buddy, Steve Witkoff, was “you’re fired!” Question, though: Is it an improvement?

RogerG

Here’s President Trump speaking before the National Republican Congressional Committee in March (see #1): “I’m proud to be the president for the workers, not the outsourcers — the president who stands up for Main Street, not Wall Street.” Only in politics can a person sell such economic bunk. It’s class warfare coming out of the mouth of a Republican. Who’d have thunk it?

Earlier, before Trump selected him for the VP slot, J.D. Vance was positioning himself to the left, sharing ideological space with Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. One investor told Financial Times in regards to this possible GOP dynamic duo in 2024 (see #2), “We don’t need a Republican Bernie Sanders.” Indeed. But left-wing demagoguery should not be surprising in a person (Trump) who pinball bounced since 1987 from Republican to Independent to Democrat to Republican to Independent to Republican, with a stopover in the Reform Party in the 1990s and early 2000s, picking up a little Marxian lingo along the way.

But here’s the rub: basing policy on the Marxist dialectic is not a path to prosperity. Lenin, Stalin, Mao, the Kim family of North Korea, and the Castros couldn’t make it work. Not the British Labor Party. The reality is that economic actors are linked in mutual cooperation. As such, Wall Street and Main Street are not at odds. They are in the same boat. One is inextricably tied to the other. When Wall Street sneezes, Main Street catches a cold. The Trump tariff campaign has given Wall Street the chills and small businesses are heading to the medicine cabinet.

For example, watch the video below to see how Trump’s war on imports is turning into a war on Main Street. In the clip, an owner of a small shop selling vintage and new audio gear in Des Moines, Iowa, describes the travails inaugurated by Trump’s chaotic crusade of on-again/off-again and wildly gyrating tariffs. Trump introduced price increases and massive uncertainty, wreaking havoc on any business doing . . . business.

Scrap “Wall Street vs. Main Street”. It’s Trump vs. the Streets.

RogerG

Sources:

1. “Debatable: Trump’s ‘Wall Street vs. Main Street’ argument for tariffs”, Morgan Chalfant, Semafor, 4/20/2025, at https://finance.yahoo.com/news/debatable-trump-wall-street-vs-042439600.html
2. “’We don’t need a Republican Bernie Sanders.’ Why Trump’s choice of Vance spooks Wall Street.”, Morningstar, 7/16/2024, at https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240716129/we-dont-need-a-republican-bernie-sanders-why-trumps-choice-of-vance-spooks-wall-street

There’s much litter lying around in popular economic discussions. Confusion abounds and drivel spreads when the subject turns to the economy. Most economic understanding doesn’t stretch beyond the popular nose. People go down to the supermarket and can’t afford eggs, or they notice that their young adult offspring can’t afford the American dream. The banalities in the popular discussion of “pocketbook issues” usually ends up becoming an attack on pocketbooks. Not much understanding is apparent. It’s the opening for the demagogue.

How so? Let’s begin with the basics. There are only two kinds of economics: free market economics and poli-sci economics, which is not really economics. Economics is the study of what we do for a living, both in what we produce and trade for, both at the micro (individual) and macro (national) levels. Unstated but essential is the personal freedom to make those decisions, ergo a free market. Once that freedom is curtailed beyond the widely accepted vices, the subject morphs into political science and the role of political functionaries to direct, manage, and plan. More succinctly, self-styled gurus assert the power to decide, not the individual. There’s no such thing as socialist or communist or managed-trade economics. At best, or worst, economics becomes nothing but a subsidiary of politics and the workings of government. The hybrid – an oxymoronic “politicized economics” – gives you a bastardized politics and a bastardized economics.

The Democratic Party, Trump, Vance, and the MAGA movement are all into bastardization. They, in a myriad of ways, desire to direct us toward their grand vision of their better world. The Dems are bedeviled by a 360-degree dread of inequality and the human desire to make nature useful to us. Their economics is politics, the politics of a corpulent and intrusive Leviathan, with the exception of an expanded lane for moral license.

The MAGA crowd envisions an American paradise unspoiled of foreign influences. Theirs is the Eden of 1950s America, a time when our industrial competitors were still recuperating from the battlefields that were once their homes, businesses, and fields. An American head start that began in the 19th century dramatically lengthened post-WWII. But then, by the 1970s, much of the rest of the world came roaring back, and MAGA retaliates with tariff walls.

Did this refashioning of economics into politics make a better world? When taken to its logical conclusion in the many shades of socialism, protectionism, or progressivism, the history is not encouraging, whether in the form of the Soviet Union, Smoot-Hawley, the New Deal, or the many Democrat offspring of their Green New Deal.

Their desperation leads them to glue their eyes and ears to the momentary gyrations of markets and numbers for confirmation, not recognizing that their favorite intrusions take time to broadly impact buyers and sellers. Frankly, Democrats don’t care, but Trump-enthusiasts seem to. Trump declares a tariff war on the world and Trumpers look to trumpet or bury the subsequent news of the consequences.

Thus, the Trump universe reacted to the dramatic fall in security markets after Trump’s early April declaration of a trade war by bellowing that it’s “Wall Street vs. Main Street”. Then markets began to recover once Trump loosened the torture screws (tariffs) in his racking of trade (Trade, by the way, is quintessential economics.). After he backed off, the supply side of the economy with its supply chains began to see light at the end of Trump’s trade-war tunnel. Markets (S&P 500 and the Dow) rebounded to levels before Trump politics were injected in the economic bloodstream. Trumpers are elated at the recapture of lost ground, but not the expulsion of the intruder who caused the retreat.

A healthy economy normally experiences growth, but Trump apologists are ecstatic about treading water. Trump central planning managed to turn an economy that perennially outperforms Europe and Japan into Europe and Japan. It’s even worse. Europe is outperforming us. The economist Dominic Pino crunched the numbers of a $1,000 investment in the S&P 500 and Dow from November 6, 2024 to the second week of May 2025 and compared it to the same input in the stock markets of the U.K., France, Italy, Spain, and Germany. They beat us (see #1). Make America Great Again (MAGA) should be refashioned into Make America Like Europe (MALE).

Of course, none of this matters much to the true believer. Turning economics into politics, or theology in the case of the true believer, is not only bad economics but it isn’t even economics.

RogerG

Sources:

1. “U.S. Stocks Continue to Underperform European Stocks”, Dominic Pino, National Review, 5/16/2025, at https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/u-s-stocks-continue-to-underperform-european-stocks/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=blog-post&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=top-bar-latest&utm_term=fifth

I’ve described Trump II (47) as Joe Biden’s second term based on Trump’s threats of prosecutions of businesses who might have to raise prices to survive the increased costs from his tariffs, something straight out of the Biden/Elizabeth Warren/AOC/Gavin Newsom playbook of 2021 to 2024. Recall “price gouging”, especially you Californians? Trump is not done shape-shifting. He mutated from a Reagan conservative in much of his first term to the occasional Biden of Trump II, and now full Ross Perot.

So, my first prognosis of Trump II, as Biden II, was correct in part, and then he peeled away his mask exposing his inner Ross Perot in his second time at the plate. Trump is finally getting the opportunity to implement Ross Perot’s spiel of the 1990s (see #1). It’s where he was all along. What we see in Trump II, the real Trump, is more of Perot’s Reform Party of the 1990s with its predilection for isolationism and protectionism, a general antipathy to foreign relations, and much less constrained by the influence of Republican Reaganism in Trump I.

That 1980s Reaganism, though, worked. A government committed to letting the economy work and a foreign policy determined to protect our allies and confront our adversaries sparked an economic wave that subsequent recessions, financial crises, and successive Leviathan-loving Democrats couldn’t fully suppress, and an era of relative international calm with the rollback of communism and the eventual fall of the USSR.

When Trump I followed the Reagan script, he and we succeeded. Red lines were enforced with swift actions. The Congressional Review Act deregulations of the 2017 Republican Congress and major tax cuts led to a second economic wave, only to be sidelined by a virus let loose from a ChiCom lab. By the time of the 2020 election, his own coarse behavior and the shutdowns turned Trump into a foul-smelling pariah to many swing voters. Many decided to give a declining octogenarian a try. Instead, the voters quickly got in 2021-2024 a radical-left culture war targeting children, the family, biology, education, the nation’s history, chaotic immigration, and bloated budgets, inflation, and an assault on energy and transportation.

It turned out once again that the coarse nose-pinching pariah became preferable by 2024 to an administration intent on aligning our lives to the wishes of a college sociology faculty. Back in 2020, I doubt if many people forecasted a left-wing war on their way of life. Now, in 2024, few expected a global tariff war or a foreign policy resuscitated from 1940, from Lindbergh’s America First Committee, in attempts to revive Obama’s Iran nuclear deal and the zeal for a deal, any deal, with Russia even if it meant humiliating and abandoning the first victim of blatant aggression on the continent of Europe not seen since the Third Reich.

To be clear, though, this latest round of electoral betrayal didn’t come from the right. It came out of Trumpism, a hodgepodge of opinions that mostly paralleled those of Ross Perot in the 1990s. The 1990s locked Trump into his current frame of mind. Perot had it in for George H.W. Bush, opposing Gulf War I and NAFTA. Negotiations creating a North America trading bloc, what later came to be called NAFTA, started with Reagan and proceeded through HW and finally concluded under Bill Clinton. In a 1992 presidential debate between HW, Clinton, and Perot, it’s clear that the Perot rhetoric of 1992 is the Trump rhetoric of 2024. Perot lambasted NAFTA as creating “a giant sucking sound going south” (see #2). Trump’s hot air about other countries “ripping us off” is a recycling of the rhetoric. For people as simple-minded as Perot and Trump, a “trade deficit” is a national expense, a debit from the nation’s nest egg going to starving foreign peasants willing to work for a pittance, thus that “giant sucking sound”.

It’s a child’s view of the world. They use “trade deficit” to describe a transaction whenever currency is exchanged for goods, which is what happens in international markets and between us and the supermarket down the street. By this slipshod reasoning, a “trade deficit” is likely to culminate every time a deal is struck with a Vietnamese clothing manufacturer or between us and Safeway. Life is filled with those horrifying “trade deficits”.

Many MAGA “elites”, the thought leaders of the movement, are consumed in hostility to imports, just like their orange man skipper. They are captivated by the abstract calculation of GDP, in the subtraction of imports in the formula, as if imports reduce a people’s economic well-being. There’s more to the story. Imports are subtracted to void double-counting since they are already an element in the “consumption” component (C) in the equation GDP=C+I+G+X, X being trade, the exports minus imports.

From this, the movement’s devotees point to a hollowed-out Rust Belt, to the “deaths of despair”, and almost any other measure of social decay as proof of a “subtraction” from our national inheritance, the alleged impact of imports. The tactic makes it easy to blame others and not consider what we did to ourselves. Little thought is devoted to the role of our extortionate labor unions or our discouraging tax rates at all levels or the vast expansion of the regulatory Leviathan that made the upper Midwest uncompetitive with the rest of the world, and the American South! Historically, one can scout the flight of American manufacturing from the Northeast (late 18th to early 19th centuries) to the Midwest (19th to the middle 20th) to the South of today in the unrelenting search for hospitable economic climes.

Though, it must be said that the adolescent thinking works well in the realm of politics. Politics does not exist if there isn’t a government to exploit, or enlisted to serve a group’s self-serving definition of the national interest. Self-interest does not take a holiday within the corridors of power. In fact, it is heightened. Narrow interests have a field day when government is getting ready to inject itself into another facet of life. It is true whether we are talking about mammoth infrastructure bills or the onset of a tariff war. Watch as these highly motivated scavengers scramble for as much of the public carcass as they can get. What comes out the other end is far removed from anyone’s conception of our Constitution’s public welfare.

Throughout the 2024 presidential contest, Trump and Biden, and then Harris, were running for the presidency of Pennsylvania in the words of the economist Dominic Pino (see #4). Why? No need for advanced physics here. They needed Pennsylvania’s 19 electoral votes, and were stumbling over each other to pander to the powerful steel workers union. Trump had more “outsider” credibility to suck up to them, and had the additional advantage of a brawling background of protectionist pimping, the Ross Perot thing. That’s how the protectionist sausage is made. It’s the nature of politics, of government. It’s the angling to hitch government power to a narrow group’s covetousness at the expense of the everyone else not in position to be heard.

This is not the self-interest of individuals in a free market, where people are free to walk away. It’s the self-interest of special interest groups to make economic war on rivals using state power. Under the aegis of government, there is no freedom to walk away. Our hegemonic labor unions love nothing better than to use government’s whip against their labor competitors – foreign and American non-union workers (88% of all U.S. workers) – and the better to insulate these labor monopolists from economic accountability for their excesses.

Case in point is the 2024 dockworkers’ strike. Historically, American organized labor married the federal government back in the 1930s (and some state governments sometime before) with Davis-Bacon (1931) and the National Labor Relations Act (1935). The mandate to pay union wages for government work, under the jargon of “prevailing wage”, and a union’s power to corral all workers at a place of employment put government in the hip pocket of these avaricious interests. More pay and less accountability on the job are at the top of the group’s list of demands. The dockworkers’ ILWU has no appetite for efficiency, innovation, and automation, only an interest in more pay, bennies, and featherbedding. Thus, the country that gave to the planet the world wide web has ports more antiquated than Mexico’s.

This is the reality of protectionism. Yet, protectionism is lauded as the pragmatic choice and free trade an idealist’s dream. Robert Lighthizer, Trump’s trade negotiator in Trump I, wrote that free trade is “mythical” and “never existed except in the minds of academics” (see #5). This logic ignores the mud wrestling of political decision making that produces the protectionist policies. Right now, the chief proponents of this blinkered thought process are Trump and Vance. They and their MAGA courtiers, inveigh against “deindustrialization” and the need for “self-sufficiency”. Vance trots off to Europe in March and spouts an attack on free trade, among other things (see #3). Of course, he fails to acknowledge that the government in its free-for-all jostling of parasitical interests will define these terms and the means to address them. Forget about a true national interest. And they assume that free trade is “mythical” and “fair trade” (?) is the practical alternative, as if amazingly sanitized of self-serving political manipulation. Who’s naïve here?

Welcome to the mind of Ross Perot updated in the thoughts and deeds of Donald Trump, his sidekick J.D. Vance, and their MAGA cadre of influencers.

No doubt, this “populism” has a fervent inward demeanor. It applies to foreign policy as well as trade. Foreign relations that cannot be reduced to widget totals and dollars and cents are suspect in the Perot/MAGA psyche. A world made safe for our people and our civilization has less purchase with this crowd. It leads to absolutely disgraceful national policy vis-à-vis the world.

The Ukraine imbroglio brought out the worst in the MAGA ecosystem, Trump, and his people. Now in the seat of power, eager to fulfill Trump’s boast of “I’ll settle the war in 24 hours”, the Trump consiglieri quickly launched a bashing of the . . . victim, the only leverage at their disposal to effectuate a deal, any deal. In an April meeting in the White House, Trump and Vance berated Zelensky over highly contentious charges of corruption and waste of American aid. On Truth Social, Trump could not resist lambasting Zelensky as a dictator, and nary a word about the real thug in the deadly game, Putin. The waterboarding of Ukraine was intensified with threats of cutting off aid and ceasing intelligence sharing. You want to talk about a world turned upside down?

It is often repeated that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Wrong! It is “peace”, peace at any price, divorced from moral judgment, and repeatedly bloviating on the loss of life and destruction as if there is nothing to die for, not freedom, nor independence, nor honor. It is disgraceful. It is all that Trump talks about whenever the subject of Ukraine arises. It sounds like cover to hide the self-centered zeal to get a “win” no matter the cost to our nation’s reputation or the safety and security of a people fighting remain free.

Do not think for a moment that other nations fail to notice the treachery, this abandonment of honor for dishonor, of virtue for ignominy. It will be hard for them not to look upon us with greater cynicism, making our job of building alliances more difficult. We are turning our back on America as the shining city on a hill, as a beacon of a free and democratic moral order.

America’s premiere place in the world cannot be dismissed in the banal caterwauling about an American “world policeman”. The descent into national solipsism has extended into the silencing of our national voice in support of beleaguered peoples in China, North Korea, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, etc., by regimes not content with tyrannizing their own people but striving to threaten others within their reach. The administration’s wielding of the meat axe on all operations of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) including Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, Radio Martí, Radio Farda (Iran), Radio Free Asia, et al, is typical Trump, using a 150mm howitzer to silence the occasional fly of wokeism. The world’s miscreants are dancing a jig from Moscow to Beijing to Teheran to Pyongyang to Havanna.

Trump in his executive order cripples all the USAGM operations to the “minimum presence and function required by law”. So much for the Constitution’s Article II command that the president “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”. So much for “faithfully”. So much for the $860 million that Congress has appropriated for the agency this year. Keri Lake, appointed as “senior adviser” to the agency, and her people have issued a suicide note for the program in describing USAGM as “not salvageable”, and further, “From top-to-bottom this agency is a giant rot and burden to the American taxpayer—a national security risk for this nation—and irretrievably broken.” (see #7)

What’s MAGA’s main complaint? Left-wing bias. According to a senior Trump aid, “[USAGM] serves as the Voice for Radical America and has pushed divisive propaganda for years now.” If so, Mr. President, do your job and administer the program by removing the malefactors and their baleful influence, and manage the program more in line with our foreign policy imperatives.

In a continuum from Ross Perot to Donald Trump, a reboot of isolationism has taken hold. An America of outward responsibilities and moral clarity comes in a distant second to America First, aka America Alone. A great deal of naïveté is necessary to have an America Alone and not have the world crumbling down around you. In the 1920s, a general popular reluctance to engage the world was replaced with the fantasies of outlawing war (Kellogg-Briand Treaty) and disarmament-lite (Washington Naval Treaty). It did not take much longer than a decade before Hitler tore up the Versailles Treaty and the Wehrmacht went on a growth spurt, ditto for Italy, and Japan was laying the keel for the two largest battleships in history (Musashi, Yamato). The Third Reich, New Roman Empire, and Japan’s Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere were on the march. The vacuum of naïveté is filled with aggression, and much worse.

What is Trump’s reaction to naked aggression? It goes something like this: they don’t attack us, we don’t care; we’ll bring “peace” by punishing the victim; and we’ll close down our efforts to bring uncensored voices to subject peoples because they upset the tender sensibilities of authoritarians.

One thing remains true about Donald Trump. Frankly, if there is not anything in it for him, like a Nobel Peace Prize, he does not seem to care. It is shameful.

This whole ignoble scene taking place before our eyes can be summed up in the presence of Laura Loomer around Donald Trump. She has peddled rantings about 9/11 being an inside job. She is a provocateur drawing attention to herself and specializing in dark conspiracies. She is to MAGA what Dylan Mulvaney is to the woke Left. She marches to the White House and shortly thereafter (April 3) Trump fires six National Security Council staffers. Like the dark web, there appears to be a dark Right that has privileged access to our president, a Right consumed in dark cabals whose number stretches into infinity.

A person like Laura Loomer has access because we have a president who dabbles in the political occult. It is a legacy of Ross Perot.

RogerG

Sources:

1. For a conservative critique of Perot’s trade claims, turn to “Setting the Record Straight: Evaluating Ross Perot’s Allegations Against the NAFTA”, Michael Wilson, The Heritage Foundation, 9/30/1993, at https://www.heritage.org/trade/report/setting-the-record-straight-evaluating-ross-perots-allegationsagainst-the-nafta. Today’s Trump-loving incarnation of the Heritage Foundation is busy eating those words.
2. 1992 presidential debate in “NAFTA 20TH ANNIV – PEROT GIANT SUCKING SOUND”, CNN, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3LvZAZ-HV4
3. The affection for protectionism is resplendent in both Trump and Vance. Trump’s most beautiful word in the English language is “tariff”. Vance speaks in Europe and clashes with conservative writers over the alleged beauties of protectionism, euphemistically referred to as “fair trade”, in bombasts on X at https://x.com/TimesBChanging/status/1906201911453171977. Dan McClaughlin in “Sorry, Mr. Vance, Things Are Not the Same as People” in National Review, lays out the buffoonery In Vance’s thinking at https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/03/sorry-mr-vance-things-are-not-the-same-as-people/.
4. Much thanks to Dominic Pino in “Free Trade Is How You Live Your Life”, National Review Magazine, May 2025, at https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2025/05/free-trade-is-how-you-live-your-life/
5. “The Free Trade Folly”, Robert Lighthizer, The American Compass, at https://americancompass.org/rebuilding-american-capitalism/productive-markets/the-free-trade-folly/
6. If you have the stomach for it, watch the entire 1993 Ross Perot/Al Gore debate on CNN’s Larry King Live and you will see Perot mannerisms in the current edition of Trump alongside the Trump spiel on free trade in the person of Perot. You’ll also notice the Perot pandering to organized labor like Trump. It can be viewed at https://youtu.be/0fi8OOAKuGQ?si=NnjfldhZK0VDLj7h.
7. “Trump orders the dismantling of government-funded, ‘propaganda’-peddling media outlet”, Emma Colton, Fox News, 3/16/2025, at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-orders-dismantling-government-funded-left-wing-media-outlet-voa?msockid=287a0b967a9564c61c991f537b2f65ee
8. “Voice of America goes silent as Trump signs executive order gutting network’s parent agency”, Ariel Zilber, New York Post, 3/27/2025, at https://nypost.com/2025/03/17/media/voice-of-america-goes-silent-as-trump-guts-networks-parent-agency/
9. “Federal judge blocks Trump administration from dismantling Voice of America”, Michael Kunzelman and Rebecca Boone, AP, 4/22/2025, at https://apnews.com/article/voice-of-america-trump-f30c48df0c16de622ec5fd99ee6c627c